Description
If we are living within a constant simulation, how do we assimilate the adoption of new technologies into our practices?
For us, nature and technology are not opposing concepts.
We are a collective learning how to coexist with a system that moves faster than the times of the body.
AI appears in our practice as a tool for infinite prototyping, within a dialogue that begins with experimentation and with the questions we ask ourselves throughout the process. Through this tool, we encounter the possibility of creating our own universes, multiple, unstable, and coexisting, opening a space where different versions of reality can be tested, layered, and reimagined.
This exploration always starts from a real, situated, in-situ experience.
We do not believe in a neutral tool.
AI amplifies whatever activates it: it accelerates when speed is demanded, cleans when efficiency is required, and repeats when criteria are removed.
That is why we insist on human presence, not as control, but as a necessary friction.
Within performance, error occupies a central place in our way of producing. Many pieces emerge from testing, experimentation, the persistent use of the body, and from what fails along the way.
When working with artificial intelligence, we wanted to explore the same logic: to chase the glitch, insisting on interruption, finding in those interstices a productive tension that continues to drive our enthusiasm, even when AI tends to clean, optimize, or close forms.
We are interested in what becomes unexpected when the code breaks.
If life is art, we believe it is possible to inscribe analog methodologies, such as error, fragility, repetition, and exhaustion, within digital tools that operate through acceleration and efficiency. In this intersection, the body reappears as a measure, not to control the system, but to tension it.